人工智能英语的 影评
字数大约150字额~~~ 顺便翻译一下 有些生词我不懂?
The movie provides an example of failing to draw an audience into a story, and an example of story structure that takes away from a story.
AI is about the question, "What makes us human?" Can a robot (computer intelligence) ever be human? The boy robot David is created to be fully capable of human characteristics, even love. But he is quickly rejected by his family, and the rest of the story is about his quest to become human so he can regain his mother's acceptance and love.
The first twenty minutes of a film, the opening, are critical for engaging the audience. This story has an intriguing story line, great settings, nice special effects, and enough motivation and emotion in the opening, so why doesn't it emotionally engage the audience? Because we don't identify with the struggles of the people involved since there is no continuity of any single character's story.
求：人工智能的英文影评
I saw A.I. on the first night it ran here and I must say I was disappointed in the size of the audience. How strange to see so few people show up for a Spielberg film. This film did not enjoy the normal hype that most of Spielberg's films enjoy, I think I know why. Lack of product placement. They're may have been some somewhere but I didn't see them. A.I.'s story line and flawless visual effects reflect what I can only describe as the meeting of two great film makers. Kubrick (who started work on the project after he read the Aldiss book in '83),and Steven Spielberg who's long list of intelligent blockbusters made him the perfect person to bring this story to the screen. I could, I believe see the story boards and concepts Kubrick developed and I could also see the sensitivity that Spielberg added to scenes and characters. These two things are not entirely separate in good Science Fiction. All good science fiction has some human sensitivity in it otherwise it would just be a horror film. The script reflects some of the darkness and coldness that sometimes underlies each character human and machine, there is no fear of this in the story. This darkness draws us on in the story.The visual effects are stunning and come darn close to genius. The story line takes us in and the visuals make it almost real.
A.I. Is a good union of two great film makers., 1 July 2001
Author: John R. Armstrong (Jafredderf@aol.com) from Chicago
I wish I had Mr. Mannings grip of syntax, but all in all at the end of the day it's good science fiction and a good story too. I beleve that Stanley Kubrick's choice of asking Steven Spielberg to make this film was the kind of genius that Kubrick showed in all his work. It is a tribute to both men that they saw a vision of something and worked toward it's creation. I think they came to a great place in film making.
Future classic...?, 26 September 2001
Author: Chris Harrison ( *** be82@aol.com) from Wiltshire, England
First of all, once again I think the critics have got it wrong. Like Blade Runner and 2001, this is a film that will be properly judged in 10/20 years or maybe more. Its way ahead of its time, the combination of Kubrick and Spielberg is unique, its unlikely we will ever see anything like this again.
Did I like it? The answer would have to be yes, the mix of styles will put many people off, but I found it to be unlike anything I have ever seen, and all the better for it. The story is by no means original but everything else about the film is so different that this can be forgiven. To get one thing straight, Kubrick decided Spielberg would be the better man for directing it, and I think this was a very wise decision, many of the ideas are pure Kubrick, but Spielberg has the neccassary attributes to direct such a film, and great credit has to go to Kubrick for handing it to him.
Haley Joel O *** ent is amazing, the robot/human emotion must be amazingly difficult to pull off effectively, but O *** ent does it with such relative ease to the point where you do believe he is a robot, not that he is just acting as a robot. Jude Law is excellent, and so to is Frances O'Conner.
As for the ending, as brave as an idea it may of been to end on a downbeat note at "the first ending" I think the slightly upbeat ending is much more appropriate.
All in all I would say A.I is a wonderfully unique film that should be judged for what it is, a film. Forget everything about the Spielberg/Kubrick "issue" and just sit back and take in a truely amazing film. You may hate it, you may love it, but no matter what, it will effect your emotions in some way and you will discuss the film afterwards.
This film will be truely judged in 20 years or so, when it can be assessed purely as a film, as with 'Blade Runner', '2001', and even 'The Thing', it will get better with age.
A.I.--A Film With Heart And Brains, 6 July 2001
Author: virek213 from San Gabriel, Ca., USA
Steven Spielberg's latest movie A.I.: ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, which he took up at the encouragement of the late, great Stanley Kubrick, has caused widely divergent comments. And I can't help wondering if the most scathingly negative reviews of this movie aren't just an open desire to see Spielberg crash, as he had with "1941" and HOOK.
For my money, Spielberg has done it again with this futuristic science fiction drama, regardless of what the negative reviews say. Its story of a robot boy (Haley Joel O *** ent) who desires to be a real boy in a far future in which humans (Orgas) and machines (Mechas) exist side-by-side but not always in harmony is very much modeled on the Pinocchio story, though it is actually based on a 1969 short story by Brian Aldiss. It raises some interesting and sometimes unsettling moral dilemmas that few films of late have done. Can a parent love a child, even if that child is not real? What might happen if that child desired to be real? How will Man and Machine be able to co-exist?
Like all intelligent science fiction, such as Kubrick's own 2001: A SPACE ODYSSEY and Spielberg's own CLOSE ENCOUNTERS, A.I. forces us to ponder where we've been and where we might be going. It's an incredible combination of Kubrick's icy intellectual and clinical mind and Spielberg's emotional heart; and I think it works exceedingly well. But it forces the viewer to not leave their heart and brains at the door, which I think is why it is being so negatively received in this season of mindless summer movie fare. It may be too intelligent for its own good, and many don't have the 145 minutes of patience needed for the movie. I did, however; and I would call this an absolute masterpiece. Out of ten stars, give this one a 10.
A mind-blowing movie that will grow in stature, 6 March 2002
Author: Magnus (velkjent@hotmail.com)
Wow! That was all I could say when I walked out of the theatre after my first helping of A.I. I wasn't sure whether I loved the movie or was disappointed by it, I just knew it had had a huge effect on me. Having seen it a further three times at the cinema, I still find fault with it, but I keep returning to it, thinking about it, discussing it, and it has left me with a feeling that, five months later, I've still not shaked. In many regards, this movie reminds me of Fight Club, not in terms of theme or emotional content, but due to it's level of craft, the daring nature of it's execution and the fact that I keep re-evaluating it. All the things that are possible to comment objectively on (if anything ever is) are handled expertly. The performances are top-notch, especially Haley Joel O *** ent as David, the little robot child that longs to be human. The effects are not only very impressive, but are integrated into the story rather than calling attention to themselves. Januz Kaminski's photography is, as one has come to expect, impressive, and the movie is unusually unpredictable for such a big-budget experience.
In my opinion, John Williams' score is among his most impressive. I listened to it on CD for three weeks before seeing the movie, and thought it was fantastic, but once the movie started rolling I completely forgot about the music. That says a lot about both the score and the film itself. I also liked the three-act structure, in which the tone and feel of the movie changes drastically as the story progresses. Part one, as one reviewer noted, feels like a cross between E.T. and The Shining, an odd, but very effective combination. The second part of the movie is awash with Spielbergian imagery, but with the darkness and coldness of a Kubrick movie. And the last part is a head-scratcher that has the intellectual resonance of most Kubrick-films, and the emotional tone of something like Cinema Paradiso. I purposely refrain from saying that it is as emotional as Spielberg-films, because I think the director's complexities, the dark aspects of his style, and the occasional subtleties of his work are often overlooked by critics.
It's difficult to discuss the themes of the movie without spoiling it, but while many people criticised the movie from having several false endings, I felt that each continuation added layers of though and complexities that the movie would have lacked had it ended sooner. I have come to the conclusion, over the past months, that I do love the movie and that it is my favourite film of 2001, even ahead of The Fellowship of The Ring and Amelie. In other words, buy it on DVD, it's more than worth it.
==============================================================
All of the above from IMDB.
下面分享相关内容的知识扩展：
美国科幻片《人工智能》，雷声大雨点小，却感动了很多人吗？
看过很多科幻片，能让你感动流泪的应该没几部吧，美国科幻片《人工智能》，从表面看确实有点雷声大雨点小，但是用心看的话，还是有很多感人的地方，可以说是科幻经典，一部非常感人的电影！
原创声明：本文由得心电影编辑得心原创，感谢分享，文章未经允许严禁转载抄袭，发现必究！在合适的时间，看一部合适的电影，你会收获很多；人生太短，等不及茶凉，若是常驻，得心愿奉上一篇最真实精彩的影评陪你走完这一场！
1.《人工智能》倒没有说科技统治人类，但是电影中的机器人明显被人类所奴役，斯皮尔伯格对于机器人和人工智能是心存善意的，他也不希望人类被科技统治，他希望人类和科技保持和平共处的关系。在他的新片《头号玩家》中表现的很明显。最科幻的是，3只人工智能产物相依为命，这其实已经证实了人工智能是有情感关怀性的了。结尾兼具童话性，超乎我的想象。
2.一部变相的犹太人受难史，人类对应的是狂热状态下的纳粹德国，核心则是永恒的大部族群对小部族群的恐惧。故事谴责的，可以使任何激进种族主义。唉，斯皮尔伯格在《辛德勒的名单》里没表达完全，这次，借着《人工智能》，成熟地说出了一些之前没说出的话。科幻经典，一部非常感人的电影。预见性是一个社会领先的更好洞见，我们的感情让人与众不同，但是如果AI统治了世界，情感就成了一个低效的羁绊。所以AI有了情感，他们取代人类不是更好吗？当导演已经想到2000年后的事，我们还是做民族骄傲，人类才是更大的民族好嘛。
3.也有很多人说：所谓的母亲抛弃了机器人的情节，个人行为，跟所谓人性没有多少的关系，设定太无聊，亮点是这是我看过的时间跨度更大的科幻。片子太长了，细数内容情节却有点纠缠不清。煽情是肯定的。要说明什么呢，感觉机器人会变成人吗，还是，他们变成了有生命的小猫小狗，需要爱了。到底有多少是可以永恒的。人类的生命真的是那么短吗。有些看来天长地久的东西，最后都敌不过人类的长久，在岁月中消失了。
4.当角色静默，场景剧情推进的时候，确实有些库布里克的神韵和气质，不过每逢台词响起，就非常的斯皮尔伯格，两种感觉混合相伴，真让人不禁十分想看“真正的原版”会是什么样子...，对科技时代的道德反思建构的却是一个科技主义解决一切的幻景。所谓的爱，所谓的温情，所谓的永恒，都成了这个娱乐至死的年代所虚构的诸多的童话之一。
5.十七年后重温，虽然沉重，但是不失为一部佳片。机器小孩大卫为了寻找妈妈的爱，梦想成为真正的小孩，一直印在脑海里是大卫纯真无邪的蓝色眼睛，妈妈把他扔在森林的一幕无法忍耐。片中开始的一幕说，和人类下棋的机器人是机器不是机器人，忍俊不禁想起了阿尔法狗。看的时候很难受，他什么都不懂，只想要妈妈的爱。而妈妈又有什么错呢，她只是太爱自己的孩子，所以创造了他，又放弃了他。
6.你也可以认为《人工智能》就是一部纯粹的斯皮尔伯格作品。老斯果然无心探讨人工智能的尖锐问题，而是放手走通俗温情路线，但无疑大众会更加痴迷于这种通俗剧本。两千年的穿越实在是出乎我的意料，没想到竟是借不可能的力量完成不可能之事，不免令人失望，只能靠更多的动人时刻来弥补这些妥协。有教育意义。
7.也许总是有这样的未来，人工智能超越了人类，然后努力追求成为人的过程——这其实是天马博士的故事吧。裘德洛的冒险却不是，但最后过了无数年，到人类都灭绝了，才由外星人已经无法理喻的高科技给了大卫以真正的生命：那么真正的生命是什么呢？到此已经超越了人类范围内狭隘的理解了吧：就是传说中库布里克的理念吗？
8.相信这就是看三次哭十三次的节奏，太虐了…，小海利的演技简直没得挑，那小眼神儿一过来整颗心都软了…，每次听到mammy都觉得心尖儿颤…，我能想到最难过的事，就是永恒的生命和不变的爱。小泰迪萌翻了，但是看到最后大卫和莫妮卡一直睡下去，泰迪一下子坐在床上呆呆的不动了那幕又是个大泪点…，好孤独…！总之：我倒是觉得，这是斯皮尔伯格更好的作品。对人文的关怀、朱迪·劳的艳男造型，以及堪称完美的细节处理，都有别于斯皮尔伯格其他的科幻片，代表儿童、未知的大卫，和代表 *** 的朱迪·劳，这两人一起去寻找答案，这本身就充满了隐喻。
电影《人工智能》中，妈妈是怎样复活的？为什么只有一天？
电影《人工智能》的末尾，外星人通过一点头发帮助妈妈复活，这应该属于克隆一类的技术吧。最关键的是我没理解电影中讲的理论，为什么只能复活一天，而且以后就再也不能复活了？我当然知道这是科幻，希望能简单解释一下这个科幻理论。谢谢。克隆只能克隆和原件一样的肉体！但是人生的经历记忆是不能克隆的！故事结尾外星人用的是一种时间倒退的 *** 来复原一个人的这样还能把这个人的人生经历记忆也复原出来，但仍然是一种复制，而不是真正的时间旅行把人带到了未来！所以有某种缺陷就是这个人只能被复制一次并且只能活一天！（就是这样设定的）
有哪些与人工智能有关的影视剧值得大力推荐？
首推去年个人最喜爱电影《机械姬》。这是答主看过的有关AI的电影里，唯一专注讨论人工智能本身的电影。电影冰冷的色调，安静的对白，以及金属质感的人设，无一不在塑造着整部电影硬科幻的基调。排除电影悬疑惊悚的成分，这是一部非常纯粹的人工智能科幻片。
电影的主题，实际上是在讨论人工智能的终极话题：人工智能的自我意识。男主角Caleb的任务是对机器人AVA进行图灵测试，而在这个过程中，他似乎逐渐被AVA吸引，对她产生了好感。而AVA是一个机器人，她利用她作为机器人的优势，对人类所偏好的特质加以分析，成功使了男主角对她产生好感并加以利用。我们可以判断，AVA是一个拥有了自我意识的机器人，因为她拥有了延续自己“生命”的欲望。至于情感，人类会拥有情感，而AI，在这里还没有发展到那种程度。一个刚刚具备自我意识的人工智能，我们不可能讨论她的情感，因为这是人类特有的一种非常复杂的思考模式。（所以我非常不明白为什么有些人写影评要骂一个人工智能绿茶婊什么的，come on 我们面对的是一个刚刚诞生的人工智能好吗，她的一切行为都是为了她作为一个人工智能拥有自我意识后的源动机：存在下去。）
然后是今年大热电视剧《西部世界》。这也是一部讲述人工智能自我意识的电视剧。这西部世界里，机器人是完全为服务人类存在的，人类可以对他们为所欲为，烧杀掳虐无所不可，因为人工智能对外部条件的一切响应都是由人类设计的，换言之，这里的机器人，还并没有自我意识。然而有压迫就有反抗，在人类对机器人程序的不断改进和探索中，一些代码像病毒一样被传播出去，使得这些机器人，逐渐有了自我意识的觉醒。电视剧表现人类对机器人的残暴行为，也是为了思考另一个命题：人工智能的道德性。如果机器人没有自我意识，对他们进行犯罪行为不是道德讨论的范畴，然而他们一旦拥有了自我意识，即使他们是人造的，对他们进行犯罪行为，是否就是不道德的？故事还没有完结，也许未来人工智能会与人类展开一场智力和心理上的较量。我们拭目以待。
